Balkinization Hosts Symposium on Alison LaCroix’s ‘The Interbellum Constitution’

Both Descendants and Ancestors: A Response to the Contributors

Let me begin by thanking Jack Balkin and Mark Graber for generously organizing this symposium and for convening such a marvelous group of contributors. I’m extremely grateful to the participants in the symposium – Jonathan GienappGreg AblavskyRachel SheldenAnna LawAnne TwittySimon GilhooleyJane MannersEvelyn AtkinsonAaron HallChristian FritzDavid SchwartzConnor Ewing, and John Mikhail – for their thoughtful and probing engagement with The Interbellum Constitution. Having sought in the book to capture something of the symphonic nature of early-nineteenth-century constitutional debates, I’m deeply honored to have such an esteemed audience of scholars gather in this forum to review the orchestra’s performance. It is both nerve racking and exhilarating to hear – from the wings – the commentators’ reactions to my efforts to animate the parade of characters and the raft of plots that constituted the highly theatrical worlds of nineteenth-century law and politics. 

The central claim of The Interbellum Constitution is that a distinct constitutional world existed in the United States between the end of the War of 1812, in 1815, and the beginning of the Civil War, in 1861. The book argues that scholars of constitutional law and thought have largely overlooked the period, mistakenly treating it as the “flyover country” between the “real” destinations: the founding and Reconstruction.

>>>>

Read more at Balkinization

Faculty books